Shang Shu尚書 has been known for its historical value in the different studies of ancient China’s politics, philosophy and culture. With abundant historical records of ancient times and the imperial edicts of the Shia夏, Sung商, Chou周 Dynasty ...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Shang Shu尚書 has been known for its historical value in the different studies of ancient China’s politics, philosophy and culture. With abundant historical records of ancient times and the imperial edicts of the Shia夏, Sung商, Chou周 Dynasty ...
Shang Shu尚書 has been known for its historical value in the different studies of ancient China’s politics, philosophy and culture. With abundant historical records of ancient times and the imperial edicts of the Shia夏, Sung商, Chou周 Dynasty selected, Shang Shu serves as the important reference for emperors’ policies. Therefore, it was regard as one of the classics in both ancient China and neighboring countries. The significance of Shang Shu is showed in The Annals of the Chosŏn Dynasty朝鮮王朝實錄that not only brought comprehensive effect on the royal family, but also influenced the scholar-officials in ancient Korea. For instance, Shang Shu was highly valued in emperor’s education. Besides, approximate one-sixth of the existing Confucian classics works from the late Koryŏ to Chosŏn Dynasty are related to Shang Shu, which shows its profound impact in the educated class. This research attempted to study how the influence of Shang Shu to the Korean peninsula and its track” through the main research objects such as The Chronicles of the Three States三國史記, History of Koryŏ高麗史, The Annals of the Chosŏn Dynasty, The Daily Records of Royal Secretariat of Chosŏn Dynasty承政院日記. Based on historical data from the Three States of Korea , the research analyzed the transmission process eastwards of Shang Shu. To understand the context and development content from numerous literatures, the transmission process was further discussed in three periods “The introduction in the Three States of Korea and the Unified Silla Dynasty ”, “The foundational period in the Koryŏ Dynasty” and “The prosperous period in the Chosŏn Dynasty”. Moreover, it will be discussed by the two prespectives, “Textbook in Jing Yan lecture經筵” and “Imperial examination” which were representative example for understanding the historical significances of Shang shu. Through these multiple perspectives with extensive sources, the research can help to analyze the significances of the study of Shang Shu in both Korea and China, as well as the interaction and transmission of Shang Shu in East Asia.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 金宗瑞, "高麗史節要" 明文堂 1981
2 鄭麟趾, "高麗史" 亞細亞文化社 1972
3 成均館大學校大東文化硏究院, "韓國經學資料集成-尚書部分" 亞細亞文化社 1989
4 劉昫, "舊唐書" 中華書局 1995
5 徐宗玉, "續大典" 首爾大學奎章閣 1998
6 艾爾曼, "經學·科舉·文化史" 中華書局 2010
7 "經國大典"
8 韓致奫, "海東繹史" 財團法人民族文化推進會 2000
9 朴周鍾, "東國通志" 太學社 1986
10 "朝鮮王朝實錄"
1 金宗瑞, "高麗史節要" 明文堂 1981
2 鄭麟趾, "高麗史" 亞細亞文化社 1972
3 成均館大學校大東文化硏究院, "韓國經學資料集成-尚書部分" 亞細亞文化社 1989
4 劉昫, "舊唐書" 中華書局 1995
5 徐宗玉, "續大典" 首爾大學奎章閣 1998
6 艾爾曼, "經學·科舉·文化史" 中華書局 2010
7 "經國大典"
8 韓致奫, "海東繹史" 財團法人民族文化推進會 2000
9 朴周鍾, "東國通志" 太學社 1986
10 "朝鮮王朝實錄"
11 柳義養, "春官通考" 成均館大學校大東文化研究院 1977
12 歐陽修, "新唐書" 中華書局 1995
13 "承政院日記"
14 洪鳳漢, "增補文獻備考" 明文堂 2000
15 林慶彰, "中國經學研究的新視野" 萬卷樓圖書股份有限公司 2012
16 金富軾, "三國史記" 財團法人民族文化推進會 1973
국내 비한국계 중국인 결혼이민자 가족 자녀 대상 중국어교육에 대한 몇 가지 제언
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | |
2017-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가) | |
2016-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | |
2013-04-03 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 한국현대중국연구회 -> 한국중국언어문화연구회영문명 : Korea Research Center For China -> Korean Society of Study on Chinese Languge and Culture | |
2013-04-03 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 韓中言語文化硏究 -> 한중언어문화연구 | |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.04 | 0.03 | 0.199 | 0.02 |